The following is one of the entry from the web when googling on the subject of Grace, from https://www.gotquestions.org/law-vs-grace.html
Question: “Law vs. grace—why is there so much conflict among Christians on the issue?” Answer: One side says, “Salvation is by grace and grace alone.” The other side counters, “That idea leads to lawlessness. God’s righteous standard in the Law must be upheld.” And someone else chimes in with, “Salvation is by grace, but grace only comes to those who obey God’s Law.” At the root of the debate are differing views on the basis of salvation. The importance of the issue helps fuel the intensity of the discussion.
Somehow, probably unintentionally, the law is pitted against Grace, while others would approach this perennial issue as “Law and Grace”. The image that comes to my mind is that of a see-saw, with Law and Grace placed on either ends, with each teaching / principle as having valid and justifiable claim in our faith, and the weightage accorded to teaching dependent on our denominational and traditional persuasion and preference.
Two nights ago, I attended a session titled “Law and Grace” conducted by a clergyman who also wrote a book of the same title. The introduction to his book stated
“Super or hyper grace teaching is gaining both adherents and detractors across continents and denominations. Those in support of this teaching find new liberty from guilt and condemnation in its emphasis on the grace of God; while others question the denigration of the law of God and the manner in which Scripture is interpreted. Without a doubt, the message has mass appeal; with the messengers who deliver the teaching being both charming and eloquent greatly aiding the cause. Is this a fresh revelation from God, or a deception of the devil? Why is Grace teaching so compelling, yet divisive? Are law and grace—both of God—truly opposed to each other? What is the root issue over which we are all concerned?”
The author was fair and factual to state that the debate on Law and Grace is not new, but has been on raging for centuries, delineating the drifts and swings as in a pendulum. The guess is it might swing from the current popularity of Grace teaching to the demands of the Law in the future.
So this subject of Law and Grace has been observed as the opposite appeals of God’s truth, with each teaching having equal legitimacy and validity. So now, we not only have the image of a see-saw, but that of a pendulum – “Law and Grace”.
The author upheld the biblical narrative that God dwelt with man in Grace before the Law was given – reaching out to man’s fall with Grace by providing the garments made out of the bloodied skins. He was sound in clarifying the scriptural intention of the law, and submitted that each has to form his own conclusion, from his own study of scriptures. He was very neutral, and accurately reported on the current developments in Singapore, the persuasions and preferences of believers drawn from the diverse institutional and denominational spectrum.
I just had to interject. I noted that it has been inadequately (or even incorrectly termed) as “Law and Grace”, “Law vs Grace”. But from the dawn of world redemption, God has always been reaching out to us in Grace. And the best way to understand the law in the OT would be to see what Jesus Christ and His apostles (ie the NT) has to say about the law. I brought up how John understood in John 1:17 “For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.” And how Hebrews 3:1-6 tells us that Moses was a servant, while Jesus IS THE SON!
So I advocated that this subject of Law and Grace should be definitively be titled as “Law in Grace“