- THUMOS – learnt a new word this morning in the papers : and totally agree with the insightful writer and glad that he verbalizes my gripe and takes a bite at the nannies (Singaporeans have grown up) :-
The instant I read Mr Leslie Tong’s opinion piece in today’s newspaper, I commented and shared to my regular WhatsApp group.
But the THUMOS that resonates within me has more to do with the feeling (and observed widely in other church goers) with the church I attended weekly to worship, and tuned-in weekly now because of the Covid19 pandemic.
So what is my personal thumos with the sermonizing in my church? Apparently it wasn’t just me – many had felt this way :- repetition of themes related to success, strength, youthfulness, healing, victory, overcoming, possessing etc. – all having to do with reigning in life; way to life and health; Indeed such themes are in the scripture, but we know there’s much more to the whole counsel of God. So where’s the rest of it?
I recall clearly how mid-way in a sermon, we were summoned to stand while the pastor prayed 3 John 2 over all of us, and the response and amen was spontaneous and palpable! The mid-sermon prayer was unprecedented and unforgettable. Unforgettable, because it aroused questions within me. For such a momentous injection of a mid-sermon special prayer, the prayer must be singular, special, crucial, all-important. But I knew that was not the only prayer in the NT; it was a merely personal prayer specifically for a old man, typically advanced in years, and presumably, the author dutifully wished and prayed for his well-being. To pattern such a prayer for an individual and eisegetically apply it for the entire congregation might be conflating scripture to appeal, attract (seduce? – oh I’m very harsh here) the audience. There are much more essential, vital and pivotal prayers meant for all saints. And I blogged – when will the pulpit sermonize about the other prayers in the NT? And that episode was years years ago.
Months ago, while having tea with fellow church members, I was told a senior church staff has spoken directly to key adult leaders via YT. The sentiments to the message lead to it being circulated widely. Presumably it was a admonishment to feedback that the pastor’s messages were repetitive, rehashed, without much content, freshness …. (I would add void of exposition, exegesis).
So, reading about thumos this morning brought me back to what I heard during that tea fellowship.
Years ago, the pulpit put-down pastors – even grace pastors from other churches who did not believe in tithing. I thought then – that wasn’t wise or fair. The pulpit withheld the context of what other churches subscribed to ie according to Hebrews 7, the levitical tithing has been done-away with. We don’t have to be another Zohner to conflate narratives to alleviate ourselves. I was embarrassed that our pulpit said such. After many days, I was prompted in spirit to write to my pastor. But my pastor had oftentimes explicitly told the congregation never to write to him. But I was prompted and I could only obey the voice within. So I wrote to him, but through another pastor, asking that my letter be delivered to the speaker (I did recount the events previously here in this blog). So what am I trying to say. There is thumos in all us especially towards the people and the structure whom we align with and commit and submit to. My thumos got the better of me then. We look up to such people and structure to pastor us – to protect, perfect, provide and partner with us. And such people would be better to minister if they know how I feel, how I fare, what I think and what I observe and how I can contribute whether in concrete terms or as feedback. Without regard to the thumos of the members, one cannot know how members feel or fare. Scripture is very clear.
Proverbs 27:23 “Know well the condition of your flocks,
and give attention to your herds,“
Phillip Keller’s book on Psalm 23 is one of my all time favorite. I wonder how many leaders and pastors know the vocation and work of a shepherd, or more specifically and thoroughly the subject of their charge, or moreso the state of the sheep. In the book of 1 Thessalonians, Paul exemplified his own ministry : in tending to lambs, to nourish them to grow, to nurse them to health, and nurture them to grow – the role of a mother. And in tending to sheep (lambs and sheep – did Paul learn about Jesus’ imperative from Peter?) to model before them the life of Jesus (close proximity and presence, to mature them in grace and truth. The role as a father in the faith. He was a mentor them. Example is not the best way to teach and transmit a life. It is the only way.
By post, Paul shared how he felt towards the Thessalonians. He revealed the purpose of his life – pure in his motives, purity in his message, methods (no manipulation or marketting) and ministry as a mother and father. Paul was in prayer constantly and continuously for those in his charge, ministered gladly in person (1 Thes 1:10). When he could not meet, he had to send a proxy (1 Thess 2:17-3:1) for they were his crown, his glory and his joy. Paul protected them, for they must be grounded in the faith (1 Thess 3:1-5), and not profited from them (1 Thess 2:5). (Wonder whether the NT apostles sold their teachings and meditations? Can’t resist this jibe after reading pastor Skye Jethani’s The Evangelical INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX and the Rise of Celebrity Pastors)
The Evangelical Industrial Complex mirrored what Richard Halverson said :-
“In the beginning the church was a fellowship of men and women centered on the living Christ. Then the church moved to Greece, where it became a philosophy. Then it moved to Rome, where it became an institution. Next, it moved to Europe, where it became a culture. And, finally, it moved to America, where it became an enterprise.”
The scripture in 1 Thessalonians has provided us with the pattern and practice for church ministers and ministry. When people (the crown, glory, joy, according to Paul) are neglected, ignored, this priority has been misplaced or replaced by some other pursuits or pre-occupation – whether by choice, chance or convenience. Especially so when churches have been blessed with success (in earthly terms?) in numbers, resources, reach, etc. As with geo-politics hubris can set in.
Hubris could likely ignore the thumos.